Grassroots Actions for Peace

Founded Concord, MA 1991

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world;
Indeed it's the only thing that ever has."
 - Margaret Mead

 
Our Current
Grassroots Campaigns
Depleted Uranium Campaigns Local, National, International

Bioweapons Laboratories in MA



United States Department of Peace




Find on GRAP:

 
 

Welcome to 'Grassroots Actions for Peace'

Announcements  |  Headlines  |  Actions  |  Climate Action  |  Latest Articles  |  PTP  |  What's New Index  |  Archive Page

Grassroots Actions for Peace is a volunteer group which was first organized at the beginning of the 1991 Gulf War, on the principle that negotiated, non-violent resolutions of conflicts are a better alternative to war.

Most of our members live in the metro west area of Boston, near Concord, Massachusetts. We take actions locally on issues which have national and international importance, such as the wars in Iraq, cutting the military budget, the USA Patriot Act and depleted uranium wherever it is used, weapons or consumer products.

Depleted uranium weapons, which were manufactured locally in Concord, were first used in the Gulf War. We recognized a responsibility to learn about depleted uranium and its effects. This led to organizing efforts over the last ten years to ban the use of this radiologically and chemically toxic material.

We encourage people to work together at the local level because we believe this is where all movements for change begin.


Never Give Up
“Never give up, no matter what is going on. Develop the heart. Too much energy in your country is spent on developing the mind instead of the heart. Develop the heart. Be compassionate. Not just to your friends, but to everyone. Be compassionate. Work for peace, in your heart and in the world. And I say again, never give up. No matter what is happening. No matter what is going on around you. Never give up."   From the Dalai Lama


Headlines

A Nation of Sheep

The Story of Lisa Kelly by Ralph Nader, published by LibertyUnderground (Univeristy of Virginia), 08 May 2008

This is a tale of pay or die that recurs again and again all over our country and only in our country in the entire western world.

Advised by her physician to go to M.D. Anderson for urgent treatment of her leukemia, Mrs. Lisa Kelly was told she had to pay $105,000 up front before being admitted. The hospital declared her limited insurance unacceptable.

Sitting in the business office with seriously advanced cancer, she asked herself - "Are they going to send me home?" "Am I going to die?"

Time out from her torment for a moment. M.D. Anderson started this upfront payment demand in 2005 because of a spike in its bad debt load.

The Wall Street Journal explains - "The bad debt is driven by a larger number of Americans who are uninsured or who don't have enough insurance to cover costs if catastrophe strikes. Even among those with adequate insurance, deductibles and co-payments are growing so big that insured patients also have trouble paying hospitals."

It isn't as if non-profit hospitals like M.D. Anderson are hurting. Look at this finding in an Ohio State University study: net income per bed at non-profit hospitals tripled to $146,273 in 2005 from $50,669 in 2000. And you also may have noticed the huge pay packages awarded hospital executives.

M.D. Anderson, exempt from taxation, recipient of funds from large government programs and research grants has cash, investments and endowment totaling $1.9 billion, with net income of $310 million last year, the Journal reports.

Back to the 52 year old, Lisa Kelly. She and her husband returned with a check for $45,000. After a blood test and biopsy, the hospital oncologist urged admittance quickly. Then the hospital demanded an additional $60,000-$45,000 just for the lab tests and $15,000 for part of the cost of the treatment.

To shorten the story, she received chemotherapy for over a year. Often her appointment was "blocked" until she made another payment.

In a particularly grotesque incident, she was hooked up to a chemotherapy pump, but the nurses were not allowed to change the chemo bag until Mr. Kelly made another payment.

She endured other indignities and overcharges. Reporter Martinez cites $360 for blood tests that insurers pay $20 or less for and up to $120 for saline pouches that cost less than $2 retail.

Imagine anything like Mrs. Kelly's predicament and pressures occurring in Canada, Belgium, Germany, Italy, France, Switzerland, Holland, England or any other western country. It would never happen.

These countries have universal single payer health insurance. No one dies because they cannot afford health care. In America, 18,000 Americans die each year because they cannot afford health care, according to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. Many more get sick or become sicker.

None of these countries spend more than 11% of their GDP on healthcare. The U.S. spends over 16% of its GDP on health care and does not cover 47 million people and tens of millions are under covered

In the U.S. the drug companies charge their highest prices in the world, even though we, the taxpayers, subsidized them in large ways. In other countries like Mexico and Canada, they cannot get away with such drug price gouging, with a pay or die ultimatum.

In the U.S., computerized billing fraud and abuse cost over $200 billion last year, according to the GAO arm of Congress. In other counties, single payer prevents such looting.

In other countries, administrative expenses of their single payer system are about a third of what the Aetna's and other insurers rack up.

In other western countries, medical outcomes for children and adults and paid family leave are far superior to that of the U.S. The World Health Organization ranks the US health care system 37th in the world.

When apologists in Washington hear these statistics, they say "but we have the best medical research centers in the world, like M.D. Anderson."

Clearly much is wrong with the nature of pricing health care.

Like other hospitals, M.D. Anderson is caught in a macabre spider's web of cost allocations mixing treatment costs with research budgets, cash reserves, and just plain accounting gimmicks that burden patients.

When a friend showed the Journal's article to a Dutch visitor, the latter blurted in anger - "you are a nation of sheep." Not a very flattering description of "the land of the free, home of the brave."

Someday, soon maybe, Americans will finally band together and say "enough already," we're going for full Medicare for all- without loopholes for corporate profiteers and purveyors of waste and fraud.

Last month after being in remission, Lisa Kelly's leukemia has come back.

See libertyuv@hotmail.com to subscribe

Challenging Corporate Power

California Community Says Companies Are Not People; Bans Campaign Donations

In 2006, Humboldt County, California, became the latest, and largest, jurisdiction to abolish the legal doctrine known as "corporate personhood."

Measure T was successful because our all-volunteer campaign came together to pass a law that bans non-local corporations from participating in Humboldt elections. The referendum, which passed with 55 percent of the vote, also asserts that corporations cannot claim the First Amendment right to free speech.   See full article

H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (Passed) Roll-Call

With overwhelming bipartisan support, Rep. Jane Harman’s “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” passed the House 404-6 late last month and now rests in Sen. Joe Lieberman’s Homeland Security Committee. Swift Senate passage appears certain. Note: the entire Massachusetts House Delegation voted Aye.

Not since the “Patriot Act” of 2001 has any bill so threatened our constitutionally guaranteed rights.   See Baltimore Sun article at CommonDreams

Yeas and Nays on H.Res 799 (Motion to table (Kill) Impeachment Bill)

Yeas and Nays On Motion to Refer (Bury) the Resolution

States and V.A. at Odds on Cancer Data

Until Recently, the nation's cancer surveillance program was humming along. In every state, investigators were getting reports from every hospital describing every cancer patient they had seen.

.... While other hospitals are required by state laws to submit data, Veterans Affairs hospitals are not. And now, for the first time, veterans hospitals have stopped providing information on their cancer patients. The concern, the Veterans Affairs Department says, is protecting patient privacy. The department has set up a new national directive setting conditions for using patients’ personal information and has said it cannot provide data unless and until states sign it.

...Only a handful of states have signed the directive so far, and Veterans Affairs is just starting to send some of them data. Other states, including California, whose population includes more veterans than any other state’s, have not signed and say the department’s conditions are almost impossible to meet.   See entire NY Times article

Climate Action

The bad news is that we don't have as much time to resolve climate issues as previously thought. The good news is that not all is lost. The most serious consequences of global warming can be offset by steps taken quickly within the next 5 to 10 years to promote conservation, and the implementation of incentives to drive development of new business solutions to this most important of all problems besetting modern man.

Its all about the choices people make in their daily lives.
Be proactive, go to our Climate Action link above and learn more.

Announcements


Wednesday, March 19th, Concord Remembers the Fifth Anniversary of the Tragic Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.

Vigil to Stop The War, Wednesday, March 19th, 5:00 PM - 7:00PM
Flag Pole Common, Concord Center.

The Iraq War, after 5 long years, is responsible for at least three terrible tragedies: Almost 4,000 American soldiers and more than 200,000 Iraqi men, women and children have been killed. Our economy is spiraling downward and the resources needed to turn it around are being squandered in Iraq.

Protest the Iraq War, Promote Peace on Wednesday, March 19th.
"Not One More Death", "Not One More Dollar".
All are welcome.

Contact: Carol Dwyer, 245 Main St., Concord
Ann Eno, 5 Fisher Way, Westford. 979/692-5483

Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America



Boston Public Library, Monday, 24 March 2008 at 6:30 pm

The Security and Prosperity Partnership's Impact on New England
Topic: Globalization and New England: What is the Impact of the Security and Prosperity Partnership?
Speaker: Janet Eaton of the Sierra Club, Canada - SPP Researcher
Location: Boston Public Library at Copley Square in Boston
Sponsored by: North Bridge and Boston/Cambridge chapters of the Alliance for Democracy


Learn about SPP, a "super-NAFTA package of trade and security initiatives organized behind closed doors between corporate leadership and the Mexican, Canadian, and US governments, and 'free-trade' deal built on a history of neoliberal repression of workers rights. Janet Eaton, Canadian anti-globalization activist, we be speaking about this topic. background material: Security and Prosperity for Whom?

Car pools to Alewife: call 978-369-1181

Military Families Speak Out

Medford United for Justice with Peace We are working for justice and peace world-wide.
Military Families Speak Out - pdf   Please print and distribute, thank you.

Boston City Council Resolution

Resolution To Support Our Troops By Bringing Them Home From Iraq and Afghanistan and To Cut The Military Budget. In Order To Have The Resources That We Need At home   Boston City Council - pdf

Upcoming Events




Actions

Tuesday, December 18, 2007 7:30 pm
Harvey Wheeler Community Center
1276 Main Street (corner of Main and Church)

North Bridge Alliance Meeting - Agenda - All are invited

Discussion of actions we might take as a follow-up to the recent Out of Balance film showing in Concord. (See attached list of action suggestions made by the film's director Tom Jackson and climate crisis author and journalist Ross Gelbspan.)
Discussion of other projects we might take up or films we might show in the new year. Bring suggestions for either actions or films.
Decide on permanent location and dates for next year's meetings. **Note: if you have a preference for a date or locations but can't make this meeting, please let us know by responding to this email. Announcements, other business
Recommended Actions to Combat Corp Impact on State and National Global Warming Policy

During the discussion Gelbspan defined the crux of the problem and possible solutions. ExxonMobil's power "really goes beyond the issue of global warming to the issue that we're living in a corporate state." Voters have no access to government and no power as citizens. "We're living under the rule of corporations who are immune to the political process. Exxon is a very graphic example." If a congressperson takes a forceful stand against the oil and coal industries advocating the shifting of government subsidies away from fossil fuels to alternative energy technology, industry groups simply fund an opponent, and they have the money to do so.

· That's why it's crucial to get the money out of politics through public campaign financing, Gelbspan added.

Tom Jackson recommended:

· Boycotting ExxonMobil products and stock

· Asking local gas stations to use other sources for their gasoline

· Boycotting American auto companies who are bowing to pressure from the oil industry in fighting an increase in gasoline efficiency regulations.

Gelbspan also recommended:

· Querying candidates on their energy policy and on their stand on rejoining the Kyoto agreement

· Doing some research to see which candidates are getting the most money from the energy industry. Use Greenpeace's website, www.exxonsecrets.org .

· Publicize our findings with articles in local papers on the two previous points

· Put pressure on the media to report on global warming at least three times a week

· Let your congresspersons know you want them to transfer subsidies from fossil fuels to renewable energy

· Create a fund to transfer clean energy to developing counties

· While making changes in individual energy use is good, "there has to be political change" as well. Change your light bulbs, ride your bike, take public transportation, but whatever you do, tell 100 people why you're doing it-you'll lay the groundwork for the political change we need."

Additional Issues here in state:

· Research what is happening here in testing gasification of coal, develop a stand on the issue and publicize it

· Show films on coal gasification

· Support Cape Wind

When asked if all of this might take more time than we have Gelbspan responded "Maybe - some scientists are concerned that the warming may be taking on its own momentum, independent of human generated CO2." But he added that right now, there are lots of people working on this issue below the radar, "like earthworms." While it may look as if little is going on, "rapid social change can erupt as quickly as rapid climate change." We're in a race against climate catastrophe, but there's still a chance that we'll be able to make the political and technological changes necessary to preserve the planet.


Keep abreast of today's news with views you won't get from the Boston Globe or the New York Times
Be sure to read BuzzFlash, CommonDreams and Truthout.Environment daily. Signup for daily emails and alerts.

Monument Square Vigil

Every Friday 8:00 - 9:00 AM

Vigil at Monument Square, Concord Center every Friday morning from 8:00 to 9:00 AM. Held at the flag rotary at Main and Lexington Street across from the Concord, MA Town Building.

Nine years on the protest line at ATK
Every Wednesday, 7 AM, at Edina Road, Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minnesota

If protesting were an endurance sport, the oldest marathon in the country would still be going on at Alliant Techsystems.

Protest at ATK, Stormi Greener, Star Tribune

More at >> Star Tribune   cached

**** Take To The Streets.Com ****
A National Listing of Progressive Rallies and Demonstrations....

(Please watch this space for fast breaking information about actions you can take.....)
See Restoring the Public Trust below


Latest Articles

Half-Trillion Dollars for Nukes!
by Karl Grossman, , 30 May 2008

With Wall Street unwilling to finance new nuclear plants, U.S. Senators Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and John Warner of Virginia have cooked up a scheme to provide $544 billion –­ yes, with a “b” — in subsidies for new nuclear power plant development.

Their move will be debated on the floor of the Senate Tuesday, June 3.

A Lieberman aide describes the plan as “the most historic incentive for nuclear in the history of the United States.”

The Lieberman-Warner scheme is cloaked in a climate change bill — the claim being that nuclear power plants don’t emit greenhouse gases and thus don’t contribute to global warming. However, the overall “nuclear cycle” ­– which includes mining, milling, fuel enrichment and fabrication, and reprocessing — has significant greenhouse gas emissions that do contribute to global warming.

Moreover, nuclear power is enormously dangerous. Accidents like the Chernobyl explosion of 1986 stand to kill and leave many people with cancer. Nuclear plants routinely emit life-threatening radioactivity. Safeguarding nuclear waste for millions of years is an insoluble problem.

Nevertheless, there have long been powerful forces in government and the nuclear industry promoting atomic energy.

Wall Street is uneasy — rightfully regarding nuclear power as terribly risky. Six of the nation’s largest investment banks including CitiGroup, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley last year told the U.S. Department of Energy that the risks “make lenders unwilling…to extend long-term credit.”

Enter Senators Lieberman and Warner.

Safe energy advocates are outraged by their scheme. Brent Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth, says: “It’s time to focus on real global warming solutions like solar, wind and energy efficiency, not to further fatten the moribund nuclear calf.”

John Passacantando, executive director of Greenpeace USA, says: “After 50 years of unresolved safety and waste disposal issues, it perplexes many Americans why Congress would support massive subsidies for the nuclear industry. Nuclear power is a dirty and dangerous distraction from real global warming solutions.”

Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear says: “If the nuclear power industry attains this $500 billion-plus in federal taxpayer subsidies, it would effectively double the subsidies this industry has already enjoyed over the course of the past 50 years which has made it the single most subsidized industry in the energy sector.”

“Taxpayers should not be asked to continue bankrolling a nuclear power industry that has never been financially or environmentally viable,” says Sandra Schubert, director of government affairs for the Environmental Working Group. And this “especially” must not happen “in times of tight budgets.” Instead, government “should do everything in its power to rapidly pursue clean energy solutions like solar and wind.”

Sneakily, the $544 billion for nuclear power is not specifically listed in the Lieberman-Warner measure. It is “covert” legislative sleight-of-hand, says Blackwelder, with the nuclear subsidy contained in a “vaguely-entitled category for zero and low carbon energy technologies.”

“Why are they hiding it?” asks Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen. “Because they know that the environmental movement in this country is serious about addressing climate change and will not tolerate a reversion to dangerous, dirty and expensive nuclear energy.”

“It’s so deceitful,” says Kay Drey of Beyond Nuclear, who is also incensed that the media have virtually made no mention of “this would-be half-trillion dollar nuclear bail-out.”

The Nuclear Information and Resource Service has organized a campaign for people to e-mail or write or telephone their senators to stop the Lieberman-Warner effort.

But the move has major support in the Senate –­ especially from John McCain, the presumptive Republican candidate for president.

Among the subsidies nuclear power already gets is $20 billion approved by Congress and President Bush only last year. And there’s a law Congress passed, called the Price-Anderson Act, that limits liability to $10 billion for a catastrophic accident — although, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, this is a small fraction of what a nuclear plant disaster could cause in property damage, not to mention birth defects, cancers and deaths.

Turning to nuclear power to deal with climate change is like trying to treat heroin addiction with crack. Lieberman and Warner would have us pay for hundreds of billions of dollars for atomic crack.

It’s not too late to contact your senators and urge them to vote no on the Lieberman-Warner scheme.

Karl Grossman is a professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, author of several books on nuclear technology and host of the nationally syndicated TV program Enviro Close-Up.


To join the Liberty Underground news service email libertyuv@hotmail.com with "join" for a subject

You may also join our talk group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ if you would like to participate. email: libertyuv@hotmail.com

Tell your friends about us because some people just don't get it

Will Congress Plunge Us (Again) into the Nuke Power Abyss?
by Harvey Wasserman, 14 December 2007, CommonDreams.org

Congress stands at the brink of the global-warmed nuclear powered abyss. Again.

But as you read this, House and Senate Democrats and Republicans are negotiating the 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.

Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) has slipped in $25 billion in taxpayer-guaranteed loans for new nukes. The nuke reactor guarantees are bundled with $10 billion for renewable energy, $10 billion to turn coal into liquid vehicle fuel, $2 billion to turn coal into natural gas and another $2 billion to build a uranium enrichment plant. [  read more ]

Watertown, MA: Transfer of tainted site awaits study
by Christina Pazzanese, 14 Oct 2007, Boston Globe

Several large properties in the East End of Watertown, including a nearly 12-acre swath of land at Greenough Boulevard and Arsenal Street that was once used to burn depleted uranium [ed. emphasis added] from a Watertown Arsenal nuclear reactor, are undergoing close scrutiny to determine how badly contaminated they are and who is responsible for cleaning them up.. [  read more ]

Bush Executive Order: Criminalizing the Antiwar Movement
by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Global Reseach, 20 July 2007

What's next folks, had enough yet?

A presidential Executive Order issued on July 17th, repeals with the stroke of a pen the right to dissent and to oppose the Pentagon's military agenda in Iraq. [  read more ]

The Truth About Oil and Iraq
by U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, 23 May 2007, United States House of Representatives

View this text in the Congressional Record


Mr. Speaker, there is an issue of critical importance facing this Congress, and that issue relates to whether or not this Congress should pass legislation to continue to fund the war in Iraq.

The legislation contains a particular provision that would lead to the privatization of Iraq's oil, a provision that I'm quite concerned about, because I think that if we take that position, it will make it very difficult for us to ever be able to end the war.

So today I'm going to lay out the case as to why this provision that's in the bill would advance privatization and as to what the options are for this Congress. [   read more ]

Iraqi Health Issues, Diverse and Dire
by Alive in Baghdad Blog, 02 Apr 2007

Diseases and sicknesses of all kinds are gaining ground in Iraq. Activists, doctors, and the media are quick to discuss the potential ramifications of Depleted Uranium, which many argue is still highly radioactive after use. There are many other diseases, some commonplace, such as dysentery and typhoid which were virtually unheard of in Iraq before the Gulf War in 1991, but under the sanctions and instability of the current war, have greatly increased.  [  read more ]

The Silence of the Lambs? A Cry to Raise Our Voices!
by Max Fuller, member of the BRussells Tribunal Advisory Committee

Proof of US orchestration of Death Squads Killings in Iraq

... Since the mainstream western media will not hear such voices as Professor Samarree and Mr Abid, it is absolutely beholden on every decently minded individual as well as every organisation that opposes the illegal occupation of Iraq to demand the truth and bring an end to this monstrous culture of impunity. Jean Paul Sartre noted that the American assault on Vietnam was not only an attack against that nation, but an act of violence directed against the whole of humanity. If we are to have any hope of rescuing our own collective humanity, we must raise our voices to bring an end to the screaming from Iraq. ... [  read more ]

The Real Cost of Bottled Water
by Jared Blumenfeld & Susan Leal, February 18, 2007, The San Francisco Chronicle

...
Clearly, the popularity of bottled water is the result of huge marketing efforts. The global consumption of bottled water reached 41 billion gallons in 2004, up 57 percent in just five years. Even in areas where tap water is clean and safe to drink, such as in San Francisco, demand for bottled water is increasing -- producing unnecessary garbage and consuming vast quantities of energy. So what is the real cost of bottled water?

Most of the price of a bottle of water goes for its bottling, packaging, shipping, marketing, retailing and profit. Transporting bottled water by boat, truck and train involves burning massive quantities of fossil fuels. More than 5 trillion gallons of bottled water is shipped internationally each year. Here in San Francisco, we can buy water from Fiji (5,455 miles away) or Norway (5,194 miles away) and many other faraway places to satisfy our demand for the chic and exotic. These are truly the Hummers of our bottled-water generation. As further proof that the bottle is worth more than the water in it, starting in 2007, the state of California will give 5 cents for recycling a small water bottle and 10 cents for a large one....   [  read more ]

Also
Thirst: Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water (Hardcover) By Alan Snitow, Deborah Kaufman, and Michael Fox

The Day Habeas Corpus Died
By: SilentPatriot on Tuesday, October 17th, 2006

Habeas Corpus

Today, 135 years to the day after the last American President (Ulysses S. Grant) suspended habeas corpus, President Bush signed into law the Military Commissions Act of 2006. At its worst, the legislation allows President Bush or Donald Rumsfeld to declare anyone — US citizen or not — an enemy combatant, lock them up and throw away the key without a chance to prove their innocence in a court of law. In other words, every thing the Founding Fathers fought the British empire to free themselves of was reversed and nullified with the stroke of a pen, all under the guise of the War on Terror.

Jonathan Turley joined Keith to talk about the law that Senator Feingold said would be seen as "a stain on our nation's history."

Turley: "People have no idea how significant this is. Really a time of shame this is for the American system.—The strange thing is that we have become sort of constitutional couch potatoes. The Congress just gave the President despotic powers and you could hear the yawn across the country as people turned to Dancing With the Stars. It's otherworldly..People clearly don't realize what a fundamental change it is about who we are as a country. What happened today changed us. And I'm not too sure we're gonna change back anytime soon." [  read more ]

Note: Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 65 - 34. Record Vote Number: 259. Notable yea votes include Lieberman (D-CT) and Gregg (R-NH) and Sununu (R-NH). See thomas.gov

Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000

By David Brown, Washington Post Staff Writer, Wednesday, October 11, 2006; Page A12:

A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred.   See [ entire article ]

How to Watch the News in a Time of Crisis
By Danny Schechter, 01 Aug 2006, New York, New York

You can’t trust the media—and you can’t necessarily even trust yourself.

It’s the rare person who approaches a conflict like the one in Lebanon that we are watching every night with the background information to understand what’s in front of our own eyes. Like in baseball, you can’t know the players without a scorecard. Having opinions are easy, developing an analysis is not. ... [  read more ]

Why is the Media Downplaying Our Voting Scandal?
By Danny Schechter, MediaChannel.org

The public, on the other hand, not only believes that there are problems but many insist that the elections were stolen. Write Wasserman and Fitrakis: “A recent OpEdNews.com/Zogby People's poll of Pennsylvania residents, found that '39 percent said that the 2004 election was stolen. Fifty-four percent said it was legitimate. But let’s look at the demographics on this question. Of the people who watch FOX news as their primary source of TV news, one half of one percent believe it was stolen and 99 percent believe it was legitimate. Among people who watched ANY other news source but FOX, more felt the election was stolen than legitimate. The numbers varied dramatically.'”

“Here, from that poll, are the stations listed as first choice by respondents and the percentage of respondents who thought the election was stolen: CNN 70 percent; MSNBC 65 percent; CBS 64 percent; ABC 56 percent; Other 56 percent; NBC 49 percent; FOX 0.5 percent.

“With 99 percent of FOX viewers believing that the election was “legitimate,” only the constant propaganda of Rupert Murdoch’s Disinformation campaign stands in the way of a majority of Americans coming to grips with the reality of two consecutive stolen elections.”   [ Read More ]

Starmet Corp. site cleanup progress lauded by environmentalists
by Davis Bushnell, Globe Correspondent | March 9, 2006

A milestone in the cleanup of Starmet Corp.'s Super fund site in West Concord was reached with the recent removal of 3,846 drums of depleted uranium and 322 tons of depleted uranium metal, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection. [read more]

Update on BU BioTerrorism Lab
by Vicky Steinitz, February 3, 2006

The Fight Goes On.

Despite final federal approval of the lab and BU’s plans to start construction soon, we have not given up in our efforts to stop the lab. It’s important to get the word out that federal approval is not the end of the road. Since those reviewing BU’s environmental impact statements were the same people who awarded the grant to BU, we never expected them to give serious attention to the major questions raised by critics of the lab about its safety, secrecy and lack of community oversight. Two legal actions are already underway challenging the environmental reviews, and a third is being planned.

Further, state-wide and Boston regulations are currently being debated which would make what goes on in BU’s BSL4 lab much more transparent. Currently, there is a ban on rDNA research in BSL4 labs in Boston. This ban would make it impossible to carry on much of the planned research and we need to make sure that the Boston Public Health Commission fulfills its mandate to protect the public by maintaining this ban. The Fox state legislation would require labs to meet stringent safety requirements and allow public oversight. It is still in the Joint Committee on the Environment and we must insure that it gets to the floor for a full vote.

Most important to remember at this moment is that just because the building goes up doesn't mean it will house a BSL4 lab. In a suburb of Toronto, activists succeeded in keeping the BSL4 component of a laboratory intended as a combined Level 3 and 4 from going into operation. Public outrage forced this outcome. We can do the same in Boston. La lucha continua!

The Coalition to Stop the Bioterrorism Lab is planning a week of street action during the week of Valentine’s Day. Stay tuned for details. [  read more ]

Protesters Call Again for Closing of School of the Americas
by Elliott Minor, The Associated Press, November 18, 2005

.... The demonstrations are held each November to mark the Nov. 16, 1989, slayings of six Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her teenage daughter in El Salvador. A congressional task force found that some of the soldiers responsible for the massacre had been trained at the School of Americas, which moved to Fort Benning from Panama in 1984.
....
Roy Bourgeois, a Catholic priest, founded the group in 1990 in an attempt to come to grips with the violence he had witnessed as a Naval officer in Vietnam and especially as a priest working with the poor in Bolivia in the 1980s.

With polls showing waning support for the Bush administration's handling of the war in Iraq and reports of US soldiers abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan, Bourgeois said the growing anti-war sentiment and outrage over the abuses may boost the crowd beyond the 16,000 who attended last year.
....
A bill introduced this year by US Rep. James McGovern, D-Mass. (Latin America Military Training Review Act of 2005) [ H.R. 1217], calls for the closing of the school, an evaluation of the training and an investigation to determine who created the torture manuals, how the manuals were used and how they might have influenced students.....[read more]

Addendum, Orderly Protest by 19,000, Nov 21, 2005

VIDEO SPECIAL | School of the Americas Protest
A Film by Rebecca MacNeice



Points to Ponder

Must See Videos

    The Story of Stuff
    The End of America

Imagine Peace


Videy Island, Reykjavik, Iceland:
The IMAGINE PEACE TOWER is a work of art conceived by Yoko Ono in memory of John Lennon.

It is dedicated to peace and bears the inscription 'IMAGINE PEACE' in 24 languages.

Its construction and installation is a collaboration between Yoko Ono, the City of Reykjavik, Reykjavik Art Museum and Reykjavik Energy.

The work is in the form of a wishing well from which a very strong and tall tower of light emerges. The strength, intensity and brilliance of the light tower continually changes as the particles in the air fluctuate with the prevailing weather and atmospheric conditions unique to Iceland.

Every year it will light up between October 9th (Lennon's birthday) and December 8th (the day of his death).

In addition the IMAGINE PEACE TOWER will be lit on New Year's Eve, during the first week of spring and on some rare special occasions agreed between the City and Ono.

The electricity for the light comes entirely from the Hellisheidi Geothermal Power Plant.  [ read more ]

What is Single-Payer Universal Health Care?

First and foremost, Single-Payer Universal Health Care is not socialized medicine. Health care continues to be supplied by the private sector: the hospitals, the doctors; the medical associations, etc.

Second: economies are enjoyed by the private sector as they no longer have to deal with different rules for different insurance companies; with single payer, all transactions are uniform and streamlined.

Lastly: The money saved by a single-payer health care system will be translated into service for all, with no copayments, no deductibles and no doughnut-holes in coverage. No more young adults w/o insurance, no more financially strapped families w/o health coverage, no more seniors deciding whether to buy their medicine or food for the table. Insurance coverage will be portable, you no longer have to share medical information with your place of employment or worry about loss of coverage or expense of coverage should you lose or change jobs. No more nonsense. And above all, recognize that the for profit medical insurance companies have their interests in mind, not yours.

Please vote smart - [ read more ] also see this article
also Since when is saying 'the emperor has no clothes' irresponsible? See How Pete Stark Became a Pariah by Saul Landau, 2 Nov 2007, please scroll down a page or two,

Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

by ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., 01 Jun 2006: Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.. ....   [ read more ]

BushCo's Covert Attempt to Force Iraq Into Giving Up 87% of Its Oil

OpEdNews.org, 27 Oct 2007:

Why is it that neither Bush, Cheney, the mainstream media, nor any member of Congress (besides Dennis Kucinich) has said a word about the Iraq's parliament being pressured, behind the scenes, by the Bush administration, to give up their oil in exchange for a royalty payment that is a measly 12.5% of the value of all the oil that would be taken from their land by US oil companies? . ....   [ read more ]

Tomgram: Do We Already Have Our Pentagon Papers?

by Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch.com, 19 Oct, 2007:

They can't help themselves. They want to confess.

How else to explain the torture memorandums that continue to flow out of the inner sancta of this administration, the most recent of which were evidently leaked to the New York Times. Those two, from the Alberto Gonzales Justice Department, were written in 2005 and recommitted the administration to the torture techniques it had been pushing for years. As the Times noted, the first of those memorandums, from February of that year, was "an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency." The second "secret opinion" was issued as Congress moved to outlaw "cruel, inhuman, and degrading" treatment (not that such acts weren't already against U.S. and international law). It brazenly "declared that none of the C.I.A. interrogation methods violated that standard"; and, the Times assured us, "the 2005 Justice Department opinions remain in effect, and their legal conclusions have been confirmed by several more recent memorandums." ...   [ read more ]

Say What???

18 Sep 2007, Daily Mail
..."and Raytheon unveiled Silent Guardian, a device that radiates unbearable pain. “You don't have time to think about it,” said an executive. “You just run.” The ray gun, Raytheon promised, will not be sold to countries with questionable human rights records, although it will be used by the United States in Iraq".   [ read more ]

Equitable Distribution of Oil: The Truth About Oil and Iraq

How many Americans are aware of the contention between the Iraqi Parliament and the U.S. Administration on the milestone requiring the parliament to sign off on the seemingly innocuous benchmark entitled "Equitable Distribution of Oil"? This benchmark forces Iraq to relinquish control of the lions share of their oil for decades to foreign, read "American and British", corporations. For a full appreciation of this unreported issue see the bill and also this from the Daily KOS link

So as you can see, it is NOT we are fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here. It is all about the OIL, it has always been all about the OIL, pure and simple. ....   [ read more ]

Crimes Against Peace - Only We, The Citizens of the United States, Can Do Anything About It.

Aug 2007, Information Clearing House:

Do any of the charges of illegality we've been hearing about have any legal basis at all?
And why should we even care about international law anyway?. ....   [ View Video ]
p.s. don't miss the comments at the bottom of the View Video link
(hint, click on the 'Comment 0 Comment 0' link near the bottom of the page)

What Every American Should Know About Iraq

by David Michael Green at CommonDreams.org June 15, 2007:

Some people think that anyone who disagrees with the American invasion and occupation of Iraq is either a bleeding-heart liberal appeaser, a George W. Bush hater, a blame America firster, an underminer of the troops, a traitor, or a geopolitical naif.

To those who see opponents of the war as fitting into one, several, or all of these categories, I say read this page. I will make no arguments herein, nor even commentary. I will twist no data nor spin any tales. I will even include some of the comments and arguments made by the administration and its supporters.

Instead of arguing against the war, I will try to offer a fairly complete account of the relevant facts one might wish to consider when evaluating America’s policy in Iraq. Especially for those who continually claim that they, more than others, have the best interests of the troops at heart - but actually for all citizens in a democracy - it is incumbent upon us to educate ourselves about this most important of national policies. ....   [ read more ]

Climate Change: Why We Can't Wait

By James Hansen, The Nation. Posted April 21, 2007: The country's leading climatologist gives us the five necessary steps we need to take to prevent catastrophic climate change.

There's a huge gap between what is understood about global warming by the relevant scientific community and what is known about global warming by those who need to know: the public and policy-makers. We've had, in the past thirty years, one degree Fahrenheit of global warming.

But there's another one degree Fahrenheit in the pipeline due to gases that are already in the atmosphere. And there's another one degree Fahrenheit in the pipeline because of the energy infrastructure now in place -- for example, power plants and vehicles that we're not going to take off the road even if we decide that we're going to address this problem.

The Energy Department says that we're going to continue to put more and more CO2 in the atmosphere each year -- not just additional CO2 but more than we put in the year before.

If we do follow that path, even for another ten years, it guarantees that we will have dramatic climate changes that produce what I would call a different planet -- one without sea ice in the Arctic; with worldwide, repeated coastal tragedies associated with storms and a continuously rising sea level; and with regional disruptions due to freshwater shortages and shifting climatic zones.....   [ read more ]

There's only you really, to change everything.

18 May 2007: Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch.Com

The Graduation Speech I'll never give [ read more ]

Whose Oil Is It, Anyway?

New York Times Editorial, By ANTONIA JUHASZ, Published: March 13, 2007

TODAY more than three-quarters of the world’s oil is owned and controlled by governments. It wasn’t always this way.. ....   [ read more ]
What Happened to Fairness? - History of the Fairness Doctrine.

The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, called for stations to offer "equal opportunity" to all legally qualified political candidates running for office. [ read more ]




FAIR - Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. As an anti-censorship organization, we expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, FAIR believes that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.


Media Matters for America - A progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

CJR Daily - Real-Time Media Criticism from the Columbia Journalism Review.




Climate Action



"Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values determined from ice cores spanning many thousands of years (see Figure SPM.1). The global increases in carbon dioxide concentration are due primarily to fossil fuel use and land use change, while those of methane and nitrous oxide are primarily due to agriculture. {2.3, 6.4, 7.3}" - from the IPCC Summary

Good articles that describe the urgency and the need to do something in a timely manner to effect changes to effectively combat Global Warming:

The Earth today stands in imminent peril

19 Jun 2007, By Steve Connor, Science Editor, The Independent

..and nothing short of a planetary rescue will save it from the environmental cataclysm of dangerous climate change. Those are not the words of eco-warriors but the considered opinion of a group of eminent scientists writing in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.. ....   [ read more ]

See also The Environmental Channel
Wind, efficiency better investments than nuclear energy
7 Jun 2007, by Craig Etchison, Center for Nonviolent Alternatives, Fort Ashby, W.VA.

To the Editor: [Cumberland Times-News, Cumberland, MD ]

...

Nuclear power is, simply put, a complex, expensive and dangerous process for boiling water for a steam turbine. Producing the nuclear fuel requires burning vast amounts of fossil fuel to mine uranium, ship it and process it. The enrichment facility at Paducah, Ky., uses two dirty coal-fired plants to produce energy, releasing significant C02 into the atmosphere. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the plant also leaks CFC 144 gas, a powerful greenhouse gas that destroys the ozone. Somehow the industry or its apologists never mention this vast greenhouse-gas-producing infrastructure that supports nuclear power. Water used to cool reactors becomes contaminated with such things as tritium (radioactive life 200 years) and carbon 14 (radioactive life 114,600 years). Instead of insuring that these radioactive isotopes don't enter the environment, the contaminated water is routinely dumped into water we drink. The nuclear power industry also releases enormous amounts of radioactive gases into the atmosphere.

...   [  read more ]

A Progressive Growth Strategy
by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, and Ali Frick, 28 Nov 2007, American Progress Action Fund

A Low Carbon-Based Economy

Two weeks ago, the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presented its sternest warning yet about the need to immediately tackle climate change. "If there's no action before 2012, that's too late. What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment," said IPCC head Rajendra Pachauri. Progressive Growth recognizes the need for immediate action on global warming, "the greatest moral and economic challenge of our time." [  read more ]

Acting Now To Save Life On Earth
by E.O. Wilson, 21 April, The Seattle Post Intelligencer

Except for giant meteorite strikes or other such catastrophes, Earth has never experienced anything like the contemporary human juggernaut. We are in a bottleneck of overpopulation and wasteful consumption that could push half of Earth’s species to extinction in this century. As the newest reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stress, we are carelessly destabilizing the planetary surface in ways harmful to our own welfare. Paramount is the irreversible loss of natural ecosystems and species that make up the human life-support system. [  read more ]

Nothing Like Planning Ahead
By: Jo Bodell, 17 Apr 2007, Minnesota Monitor:

In an supplemental budget request, Ramsey County Sheriff Bill Fletcher is expected to ask for considerable funding to pay for security during the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul.

Fletcher, who narrowly won re-election in 2006, expects to arrest between three and five thousand protesters during the GOP's presidential nominating convention in September 2008. According to a source close to the policy-making process in St. Paul, the unconfirmed amount of $4,432,804 includes more than $80,000 for chain link fence to build outdoor holding areas for protesters. According Dave Verhasselt, spokesman for Ramsey County Manager David Twa, the Saint Paul Police generally have jurisdiction over arrests, and the Sheriff over jailing once arrests are made.

Verhasselt (who could not cite specific numbers but indicated a request "between three and four million" dollars) also said that discussion of arrest numbers at this point is purely speculative.

Protesters are a part of every large political convention, and the scope of Fletcher's projection seems to split the difference between recent examples. In 2004, six protesters were arrested at the Democratic National Convention in Boston, while approximately 10,000 were arrested during the RNC in New York City. According to sources close to the budget process, however, the St. Paul Police Department has already begun working with groups interested in expressing peaceful opposition to the RNC, and Fletcher's request appears, on its surface, to conflict with that process.  [  read more ]

Global Warming: It's About Energy
By Michael T. Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted February 17, 2007.

Global warming is an energy problem, and we cannot have both an increase in conventional fossil fuel use and a habitable planet. Yet the United States is projected to consume 35 percent more oil, coal, and gas combined in 2030 than in 2004.  [  read more ]


This website reports information from sources that we believe are accurate.

Descriptions of events are often taken directly from the websites cited; quotation marks are sometimes dispensed with in such cases.


   Archives - repository for previous announcements, actions and articles

Wings of Justice
For their courageous efforts to ensure That America Remains a Democracy of the People, By the People and For the People. And for upholding the principles embodied in the constitution of the United States of America.

Mission    Our History    Newsletter    Your Representative    Progressive Links    Contact Us    Home

Legal Issues         RSS     Top



  The Gross US National Debt


The Human Cost of Occupation
John D. Hart, Bedford, MA     

Viewing Notice: Portable Document Format (".PDF") files may be viewed
with the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.   (3e)

 
  ================ (3e) =================